Thanks to the portable App is Blender on a variety of systems, such as Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, or FreeBSD without installing applicable and can, therefore, simply from a USB-Stick to start.This makes it difficult to terms of the handling tray, and features from the world of 3D, particularly for newcomers, and requires, therefore, additional motivation for learning. Add to that Blender is only available in English.Thus, much more training time in contrast to Cinema 4D for the same successes needed. Due to the great variety of the work seems unstructured surface and the user-friendliness of the program decreases.

Through the script language Python, and various Add-ons can Blender any greatly expand. On top of that, you are not able to develop due to the integrated Game Engine in Blender with the necessary skills, your own computer game, what is Cinema 4D in this kind of possible. The Open Source program Blender has a huge feature set, and can even animate liquids with the help of the built-in physics simulation Tools are realistic.If it's what you want I recommend doing animation instead of rendering. It's good, but it's probably not the best choice if you want to make a business, plus, it just doesn't look as good as Cinema 4D. You don't need to make an object an editable to sculpt it

Surely a money maker! Hopefully it makes up for the 5000$ you paid for it.īlender is an open-source renderer for all platforms! I think. It has its cons, but definitely a good tool for professionals. Light emitting objects aren't self-illuminant The majority of professional GFX artists use it, and who can blame them? I'd recommend Mine-imator to beginners, but if you want to make a business? No.Ĭinema 4D is a reliable animation and graphics tool for experienced users. Mine-imator is an incredibly easy to use animator for windows. As you know, I've been making graphics for a pretty decent amount of time now, but I'm curious to see what the community prefer for creating said graphics.

Cinema 4d vs blender